Small Towns Fight for Passenger Rail
Amtrak’s one-track mind focuses on urban corridors. But smaller communities armed with facts, successful examples and dogged persistence are making the case for passenger rail.
Go NorthwestLeavenworth, Washington, celebrates the arrival of the Empire Builder for its first stop at the city’s new station in 2009.
Aside from Amtrak’s focus on cities, the system’s lack of equipment can pose another hurdle. The frequent answer to activists seeking expanded service is “we don’t have the cars.” While insistent states – Maine and Illinois, for example – have managed to squeeze Amtrak for more rolling stock for the state-sponsored trains like the Downeasters, that process certainly has its limits. Amtrak has sought to purchase new cars for its premier, Boston-to-Washington Northeast Corridor service, but equipment orders for long-distance trains have in recent years been limited to replacement of existing cars.
Another problem is the impact of freight trains. While the statutes guarantee Amtrak access to the tracks – owned in almost all cases by freight railroads – those companies have learned to demand a lot of money for that access to ensure that freight movement is in no way harmed. To the freight railroads, a passenger train just gets in the way. In the Southwest, the Union Pacific Railroad put a $750 million price tag on infrastructure improvements when Amtrak raised the possibility of upgrading its New Orleans-Los Angeles Sunset Limited from thrice-weekly to daily operation. The sticker shock backed Amtrak off.
The final obstacle to overcome is politics. All trains in the Amtrak system lose money, if one includes capital costs in the reckoning. That means that they don’t run without government assistance. True, all forms of transportation receive some form of government help, but it’s a heavy lift for a little town in South Dakota – a state that hasn’t seen a passenger train in close to 50 years – to demand a federal appropriation of millions for a new Amtrak route.
So it is hard to stop a train, even if you’re a town lucky enough to be along an existing Amtrak lines. For example, in Rockwood, Pennsylvania, which the Capitol Limited zooms past on its way between Chicago and Washington, the process of soliciting a stop has taken 23 years – so far.
In 2008 local boosters got Congress to order Amtrak to study stopping in the town of 900, a tourist destination because of two nearby ski areas and the Great Allegheny Passage bike trail, which parallels the tracks. The study found that the stop would actually provide more new revenue than new expense. Amtrak then required that the initiative’s backers fund a second study to work out details. That analysis indicated that the stop’s infrastructure would cost $3.6 million, which Amtrak will not pay. Amtrak will add a stop only if the community served foots the bill. As of this writing, Rockwood has not come up with the money.
Local Hank Parke reports that the community is still working on the project. At a recent brainstorming session, train advocates “tried to get creative about funding sources,” he said. “Maybe we can scale down the project a bit. We’re a persistent bunch.”
What’s encouraging about Rockwood’s situation is not simply the persistence that advocates like Parke demonstrate, but the fact that the stop would actually benefit Amtrak. The five minutes it takes to stop and restart a train cost a lot of money in fuel and labor, but it doesn’t take that many new riders to compensate for the added expense. The community only has to provide the station. That can pose challenges ranging from land acquisition to access requirements for persons with disabilities, try generating the same civic enthusiasm for a new Greyhound station.
Greyhounds have less carbon emissions than Amtrak’s current trains, but the environmental argument will not suffice to lure the granddaddy of bus companies back once its corporate leadership has decided that your town is dragging down the bottom line. A bit like the airlines, Greyhound is shifting its emphasis to express and “BoltBus” services that simply skip the small towns in favor of rider-rich metropolises. For such towns, the environmental advantages thus shift by default to trains, which are far more efficient than cars or airplanes. Indeed, the U.S. freight rail system is a model of efficient transportation perhaps unmatched on the planet – so why not passenger trains, too?
“There are plenty of older people who don’t drive, who don’t have cars,” reports Linda Cain, Chipley’s mayor. “We’re going to keep working with the local mayors, … just keep bugging them,” she said, referring to Amtrak and the other communities on the route. “I really got my doubts about it, but I sure would like to see it come back.”
Despite the gloom she projects, there are reasons for hope. Communities like Leavenworth, Washington, or the Downeaster towns north of Boston have won their battles for service and demonstrated they can provide a meaningful number of new riders. Amtrak’s ridership has increased steadily in recent years, outstripping growth in car and airline travel. Rockwood, Pennsylvania’s well-analyzed situation demonstrates that new stops on long-distance trains can make money. Communities tired of watching those silver Amtrak cars whizz by do have an alternative: find a suitable station property and start making noise.
“Never give up,” advises Wayne Davis, chairman of Train Riders Northeast. At first, he says, the now-thriving Downeaster service “was just three people in Maine sitting around a dining room table saying ‘what if?’”
Asked what sustained her town’s energies in its struggle to get Amtrak service, Leavenworth Chamber of Commerce director Nancy Smith said: “The railroad is Leavenworth’s history. It is a big, huge piece of who we were, and we wanted it to be a big piece of who we are.”