Monday, February 13, 2012

Who Said Rural States Can't Do High-Tech Research?

07/19/2007

Homestake mine careRural states can do tech. That's not a question. In the 1850s, it took 80 hours of labor to produce 100 bushels of corn. Today, because of technology and innovation, it takes less than two.

The Homestake Mine used to produce gold carried out in mine cars. Soon it will yield science.
Photo: Iwantamonkey

Small, rural states can also conduct world-class research and development, a fact that South Dakota has been busy proving over the last few years. In mid-July, South Dakota learned that the National Science Foundation had selected the abandoned Homestake gold mine in the Black Hills as the site of its new $300 million Deep Underground Science and Engineering Laboratory. Deep? Don't you know! The Homestake mine has 375 miles of tunnels drilled more than 8,000 feet into the earth.

The Yonder is not Science magazine and we don't pretend to understand the technical reasons for conducting experiments a mile below the surface. But it makes sense to us that there's no better place to study the earth than from the inside out. And it stands to reason that some experiments will work better when they are shielded from the sun's light and radiation.

What we understand a bit better is that South Dakota has made tremendous investments in the past few years in technology — and those investments are paying off. Homestake Mine underground

South Dakota ponied up $35 million to help transform Homestake into a science laboratory. And T. Denny Sanford, a Sioux Falls banker (#117 on the Forbes list of the 400 richest Americans), pledged $70 million to the project if the NSF picked Homestake for the lab instead of an abandoned mine in Colorado.

The tunnels at Homestake were drilled in a search for gold. Now abandoned, the mine shafts will be used in advanced scientific research.

The Homestake mine is just one recent bit tech progress in South Dakota, as reported by Ben Shouse in the Sioux Falls Argus Leader. Sanford donated another $400 million for a health complex in Sioux Falls that includes money for medical research. (Working with the University of South Dakota, Sanford Health will soon begin the Sanford Project — "a research venture aimed at choosing and curing a significant disease in 10 to 20 years," Shouse reports.) A state-of-the-art oil refinery is also planned.

South Dakota woke up when it realized it was spending less on research and development than any other state. Since 2003, the state has approved six new doctoral programs at its universities and opened new research centers. The latest research center will help develop drought resistant seeds.

South Dakota still ranks low on all measures of R&D spending, as the chart below will tell. It's a small state, and every governor and university president in the U.S. is scrounging research money. But researchers are moving in to South Dakota and so is private research funding. From 2000 to 2005, South Dakota ranked second in the nation among states in the percent increase in industry-financed research and development at universities. (See the chart below for all 50 states.)

And it's all happening because people in a rural state decided that a small population and vast distances couldn't keep them from developing a high-tech, high-wage economy.

Percent Change in Private Sector R&D Spending At Universities

Ranking







State







2005 Spending in $1,000







Percent Change 2001-05







1







Rhode Island







6,337







184.43







2







South Dakota







783







94.29







3







Hawaii







12,155







68.07







4







Indiana







62,805







50.88







5







Ohio







128,113







48.76







6







Arkansas







10,886







45.46







7







Florida







104,674







44.26







8







Arizona







42,370







41.59







9







New Mexico







17,381







41.34







10







Maryland







94,598







33.89







11







Nebraska







21,424







20.48







12







North Carolina







199,728







18.97







13







Connecticut







28,531







17.50







14







Tennessee







25,097







16.71







15







Colorado







33,997







15.26







16







Oregon







16,435







13.43







17







Vermont







7,270







12.99







18







North Dakota







6,901







10.56







19







New York







142,766







10.34







20







Mississippi







10,579







7.48







21







Washington, DC







13,387







4.68







22







Maine







3,881







2.97







23







California







268,883







2.73







24







Washington







49,189







2.62







25







Minnesota







27,413







1.58







26







Michigan







65,003







-0.69







27







Pennsylvania







160,337







-1.41







28







Wisconsin







22,329







-1.50







29







New Jersey







38,240







-3.29







30







South Carolina







22,146







-3.74







31







Texas







164,416







-5.75







32







Illinois







53,485







-9.63







33







Oklahoma







15,496







-10.85







34







Alabama







18,827







-13.39







35







Virginia







42,897







-13.53







36







Louisiana







22,221







-13.62







37







Massachusetts







129,193







-17.36







38







Utah







12,355







-17.64







39







Iowa







28,543







-17.78







40







Nevada







4,091







-19.44







41







Kentucky







11,262







-19.55







42







Delaware







4,048







-19.70







43







Kansas







9,911







-20.61







44







New Hampshire







9,553







-21.31







45







Georgia







69,047







-28.62







46







Missouri







23,205







-38.82







47







Wyoming







1,560







-39.56







48







West Virginia







3,855







-40.93







49







Idaho







3,846







-42.45







50







Montana







3,895







-57.12







51







Alaska







11,356







-61.08