Rural men and women are more likely to be pulling the night shift than are urban workers. So finds a new study from the Carsey Institute, at University of New Hampshire.
Sociologist
Rogelio Saenz studied when workers, metro and non-metro, arrived at the
job. He found that rural people were over-represented in
non-traditional shifts; a higher ratio of rural workers clocked in
after noon and before 6 a.m.
Saenz further found that white
workers were proportionally most likely to be employed during the
“traditional” work hours, whereas “those who tend to be more marginally
tied to the labor force (persons of color, the foreign-born, those with
English-speaking limitations, and the poor) tend to be more likely to
work during the early morning, afternoon, and evening hours."
Saenz
notes that people on second and third shifts may be deprived of
“normal” social opportunities – like school activities and access to
health care and day care.
There is also mounting evidence that night-shift workers have a greater incidence of cancer and other illnesses.
North Dakota Sen. Kent Conrad (above) is reaching into rural America's past to find a solution to the nation's health care problem. (Health care in this country costs too much, has only mediocre results and it leaves 45 million with no coverage at all.) Conrad suggests creating health care co-ops to compete with private insurers. "Mr. Conrad said his proposal stems from his experience with the rural electricity, farming and telephone co-ops in his state that are owned and run by members," according to the Wall Street Journal.
There aren't many details to the co-op scheme, although it is gaining favor among Senate Democrats. The notion is that the co-op would sell insurance to small businesses or individuals, who would then become part owners of the entity. These co-ops would negotiate rates and maybe even hire some of their own doctors.
There are those who don't think much of the idea. They point out that the Blue insurance companies started out as non-profits. Half of all people covered in the U.S. are in non-profit health plans, says another critic, yet there is no difference in prices. Another criticism might be that electric co-ops aren't always great for consumers either. The leaders of a large Texas rural electric cooperative were indicted for arranging payments of co-op money to relatives of co-op executives.
The McCook (Nebraska) Daily Gazette opined this morning: "The president is asking us, especially those of us in rural America, to take a giant leap of faith." President Obama spoke about health care this morning, outlining his thoughts for reform. The Nebraska editor has questions for the new President, who says he can cut what the nation currently spends on Medicare and Medicaid:
"Medicare and Medicaid already reimburse doctors and hospitals 20 to 40 percent less than private insurance rates, and the health care providers raise rates for patients with private insurance. Recent studies say that amounts to $89 billion more per year, or an extra $1,800 per family that those with private insurance have to pay for those on Medicare and Medicaid. Making up for the under-reimbursement for Medicare and Medicaid have been a long-term struggle for rural Nebraska hospitals, and the idea of cutting those payments still farther is incredible.
"Expecting the mutually exclusive idea of 'government efficiency' to make up the difference in time to keep a number of rural hospitals from going out of business is beyond belief. Judging from the distribution of stimulus funds, what guarantee is there that rural Nebraskans won't be forced back into the old trap of having to travel to Omaha or Denver to receive the latest in medical care? And, judging from the experience of Europe or Canada, what guarantee do we have that we won't have long waits for rationed health care, especially from specialists? An ex-Nebraskan now living in Australia compared that country's health care system to America's -- 20 years ago.
"Rural America will have to be on its guard to avoid being shortchanged in health care reform."
The good thing about rural America is that people make their own way. It's a place where small business thrives. Then again, the bad part about rural America is that more people work for small businesses, which, in this country, means that fewer people have health insurance. National Public Radio's Howard Berkes reports, "Half of all jobs in rural places are tied to small businesses, a rate 13 percent higher than in cities and suburbs. And people who work for small businesses are twice as likely to be uninsured, according to Jon Bailey of the Center for Rural Affairs in Lyons, Neb....Also common in rural areas are farmers and ranchers, who disproportionately depend on individual insurance plans."
"Health insurance is killing rural America," farmer Linus Solberg (above) told Berkes. "Because people just can't keep up and pay their bills. And that shouldn't be in America. "We can put people on the moon," he said. "We can go up and fix this Hubble satellite that we have up there. And we can't have health care for all these people. It's ridiculous."
As the nation begins a long debate about the future of health care, little has been written (or spoken) about the special needs of rural communities. Berkes sheds some light on why the health care discussion needs to have a special place for rural Americans.
When the economy gets tough, the tough make meth. Or so it seems. The Lexington (Ky.) Herald-Leader's Bill Estep reports that the number of meth labs in Kentucky has jumped over the last 18 months, as meth "cookers" have found ways to circumvent laws meant to limit production. Kentucky, like may other states, passed a law in 2005 aimed at limiting access to an ingredient needed to make the addictive drug. (Have you tried to buy a cold medicine recently?) As states have placed monthly limits on how many cold or allergy pills an individual can purchase, meth producers have recruited small armies of buyers to buy drugs containing pseudoephedrine, which is used to produce methamphetamine. "It's like anything else — give them two or three years, and they'll find ways around it," one agent told Estep.
The U.S. placed limits on the exports of pseudoephedrine to Mexico, where meth "superlabs" were built. This has slowed production south of the border, but, in turn, that has increased production here, according to Estep. Meth producers have also figured out how to produce the drug in a two-liter soda bottle.
There are still many states without restrictions on cold medicines. None of the states bordering Kentucky have limits on the sales of drugs containing pseudoephedrine. Kentucky law enforcement officials say a national law is needed. Meanwhile, the number of meth labs discovered in Kentucky fell from 604 in 2004 to 302 in 207, but then increased to 405 in 2008.
Just last year, farmers were rejoicing in high commodity prices. This year, the Denver Post's Miles Moffeit reports, "increasing numbers of farmers are considering taking their lives." The Iowa-based Sowing Seeds of Hope provides help lines for farmers in seven Midwestern states and reports that there has been a 20 percent increase in calls this year compared to the same period in 2008. The Seeds of Hope hotline received 9,000 calls through May in 2008; this year, about 11,000 have called.
"The increase in calls really started with the change in dairy prices, as they fell last fall," said Mike Rosmann, a clinical psychologist and farmer who heads Sowing the Seeds of Hope. "We're starting to see the stress mount. It's a nationwide problem." In Colorado, Moffeit reports, "the collapse of the state's largest agricultural lender, New Frontier Bank of Greeley, has further exposed personal plights. Farmers on the edge of bankruptcy have tearfully pleaded for help from government leaders in recent public meetings." The greatest increase in calls to the Seeds of Hope hotline have come from dairy and hog farms. Calls from those farm operators have jumped 40 percent from 2008
Congress has considered a Farm and Ranch Stress Assistance Network, but hasn't passed the bill. The National Farmers Union is lobbying federal officials to activate a national hotline network, according to the Post.
Living in a rural community is no protection against the spread of an infectious disease, according to researchers at Kansas State University. In fact, closer ties among rural residents may help to spread a contagion more efficiently and more widely, according to computer models developed by the KSU engineers.
Urban residents are less likely to interact with sick neighbors and are therefore less likely to either contract or to spread the disease. In rural communities, the researchers found in a survey they conducted, the number of people who would be willing to visit others during a major disease epidemic is double that of urban areas. In cities, people may have more informal contact with many people, but close contact with few. "In a rural setting, you're maybe more likely to watch out for all of your neighbors, and your neighbors may also be your uncles, aunts and other family members," one of the researchers said.
As a result, the researchers found that epidemics will spread further and faster in rural communities. Add to that a decreased access to hospital and doctors and rural areas are "especially vulnerable during an epidemic." The K-State researchers suggested that vaccines be given first to those rural residents who have the most contact with the largest number of people. Those living in small towns know exactly who those very important people are.