The last thing I wanted to do was to marry a farmer. I was a farm girl. I knew better. Besides, I had a career. The farm was going back, giving up. And then...
Intensive consolidation of food production (and food profits) started
with poultry, then took over hog farming. Now the beef market is
turning into a pyramid scheme.
Ag and Trade | Food | Growth and Development | Main Street Economics
Rural co-ops aren't just for electricity anymore. Now small towns, hospitals, schools -- and rural residents, too -- are joining forces to save on everything from paper to funeral services.
Rural groceries are in trouble. They are pressured by high utility costs, competition from big box chains and by customers who drive to find bargains instead of buying at home
What would it cost to give slaughterhouse workers a living wage and ranchers a break-even price for their cattle? Two cents a pound at the meat counter. That's all.
The Netroots Nation is meeting in Las Vegas. President Obama spoke (by video) to the group to the liberal group of Internet activist that revolve around the Daily Kos website. For the first couple of years. Netroots had sessions on rural America — the Yonder participated in a few of those panels — so we decided to check this year's gathering.
Nada. Oh, well, there's a movie that "illustrates the challenges of being an outsider in a conservative rural community...." Nothing about farms or small towns. We guess they've given up.
• The New York Times has a story about Beatrice, Nebraska's efforts to attract new residents by giving away vacant lots (above). It's really a story about property taxes and the lengths cities (small, large and in between) are going to in order to maintain tax revenues.
"Some tiny towns, particularly in the Great Plains, have made such offers before, mainly as a way to increase dwindling populations," writes Times reporter Monica Davey. "But disappearing is not the fear in Beatrice, which is home to several lawn-mowing equipment manufacturers and where the population has held steady at around 12,000 for decades. Instead, city officials are hoping to return some of the many lots the city has accumulated, because of unpaid taxes or flooding risks from the Big Blue River, and return them to the tax rolls."
•Lots of articles about food safety — or the lack thereof. After scares, and deaths, due to tainted food, the nation still doesn't have a new food safety law. The House passed a bill last year, but the Senate has yet to act. The Austin American-Statesman has a story about the delay, and what Whole Foods stores are doing in the meantime. Food writer Eric Schlosser, in the New York Times, tells us that 325,000 Americans are hospitalized by a food-borne illness every year. "Nobody should lose a child because the Senate lacks the will and the leadership to act," Schlosser writes.
Would a tax on sugared drinks make Americans skinnier? Are local foods more energy efficient? What's the future of organic food production? The U.S. Department of Agriculture has answers.
The European Paliament has voted to outlaw imports of meat that could be from cloned animals.
"Currently, (European Union) rules state that only third generation or later offspring from cloned animals can be sold for food," reports FarmingUK.com. "But with cloning widespread and virtually unregulated in major meat exporting nations like the US, Canada, Argentina and Brazil, there are currently few safeguards to stop cloned meat entering the EU food chain from outside. As a result, EU consumers could unwittingly be eating meat from cloned animals which may have genetic problems."
The vote was part of a larger effort to regulate the sale of "novel foods," those food made with production techniques not widely in sue before 1997. The New York Times notes that this could include nanotechnology. Euractiv.com says the Parliament called for a moratorium on the use of nanotechnology in foods until specific risk assessments have been made. The European House wants labels to clearly warn consumers that nanotechnology is being used.
The ban on cloned animals could set off a trade dispute with the U.S.
The U.S. Supreme Court sided with Monsanto Monday in a case involving genetically altered alfalfa seeds that are Roundup Ready. The Supreme Court, voting 7-1, overturned a lower court ruling that had barred the use of the Monsanto seed. The high court's ruling doesn't immediately allow the use of the genetically modified seed. The U.S. Department of Agriculture has yet to okay use of the seed.
This was the high court's first decision involving genetically altered crops, according to the Wall Street Journal. Those opposed to the Monsanto product said use of the seed could contaminate non-GMO alfalfa. The Supreme Court said a total band was too broad.
Justice John Paul Stevens dissented from the majority.
The New York Times notes that this decision could affect a Monsanto brand of Roundup Ready sugar beer. A federal judge has said he may bar the use of the sugar beet seed until a full environmental review is accomplished. A hearing on the sugar beet case is scheduled for July.
The Wall Street Journal said that it "appears likely that the Agriculture Department will again clear farmers to plant Roundup Ready alfalfa." The USDA's draft environmental impact statement recommended that farmers be allowed to use the new seed. A final action on alfalfa is expected next spring.