Europe is headed toward a continent-wide election — and to promote the event, voters are being told the new Parliament will decide how food is labeled.
The Los Angeles Times reports this morning that ranchers are downsizing...their cattle. Writer P. J. Huffstutter reports from Nebraska about some ranchers who are raising minicows, stocky little critters with smaller frames and smaller appetites. These "miniature Herefords consume about half that of a full-sized cow yet produce 50% to 75% of the rib-eyes and fillets, according to researchers and budget-conscious farmers," Huffstutter reports. "We get more sirloin and less soup bone," said Ali Petersson (above, with cow). "People used to look at them and laugh. Now, they want to own them."
There is a trend, according to the Times. Dairy farmers are picking up mini Jerseys, little cows that can produce two to three gallons of milk a day. The mini Herefords weigh in at between 500 and 700 pounds each. There are more than 300 mini Hereford breeders in the U.S. and there are now 20,000 minicows in the country, up from 5,000 a decade ago. (Okay, there are more than 94.5 million head of cattle in the U.S., so the minis aren't taking over.)
These cattle aren't genetically engineered to be small. They come from the original breeds brought to the U.S. from Europe. As U.S. farmers and ranchers produced more grains, they didn't worry about the price of feed as much as the amount of beef on a single cow. "Feed prices were relatively cheap, and grazing lands were accessible," a Purdue University professor said. "The plan was to get more meat per animal. But it went way too far. The animals got too big and eat so much." The microcattle are a return to earlier times. And, hey, there are even been a mini bucking bull rodeos!
Has the way we raise hogs helped create the swine flu variant that is now spreading across the globe? Mike Davis, in a column in the Guardian, writes that "corporate industrialisation of livestock production" in China and now across the world has transformed animal husbandry "into something that more closely resembles the petrochemical industry than the happy family farm depicted in school readers." He quotes a report from the Pew Research Center last year warning that industrial animal production causes a continual cycling of viruses that "increase opportunities for the generation of novel virus through mutation or recombinant events that could result in a more efficient human to human transmission."
Davis' column is based on a warning that appeared in a March 2003 article in Science magazine. Bernice Wuethrich wrote that "after years of stability, the North American swine flue virus has jumped onto an evolutionary fast track, churning out variants every year. Changes in animal husbandry, including increased vaccination, may be spurring this evolutionary surge. And researchers say that the resulting slew of dramatically different swine flue viruses could spell danger for humans, too. The evolving swine flue 'increases the likelihood that a novel virus will arise that is transmissible among humans,' says Richard Webby, a molecular virologist at St. Jude Children's Research Hospital in Memphis, Tennessee."
Pigs are good "mixing vessels" where human, bird and hog viruses can swirl and match, producing new and sometimes deadly strains. The last two flu pandemics occurred when avian and human flu viruses swapped genes in pigs.
Federal officials are telling consumers it is perfectly safe to eat pork, but fears of a "swin flu" epidemic have collapsed stock prices of ag firms on Wall Street and have led China and Russia to ban the importation of pork from some U.S. states. So far, no flu cases have been discovered in major hog-producing states (Iowa, Illinois or Minnesoata), so these areas aren't yet on the banned list. But commodity traders worry about what will happen with the first cases in those states arise.
Smithfield Foods and Tyson Foods — both members of the Yonder 40 stock index — suffered large losses by mid-afternoon. Tyson's stock was down by just over 10% Monday. Smithfield, the nation's largest hog farmer, was off by nearly 12%.
Robert Moskow, an analyst at Credit Suisse, issued a report early Monday warning that the "part that looks scariest for the U.S. pork industry is that Mexico accounts for 14% of U.S. exports and was off to a great start in 2009." Exports to Mexico are expected to decline as people in that country refrain from going out as the epidemic grows. Smithfield, meanwhile, issued a press release today saying there was no evidence that the flu had infected its Mexican operations.
Community centers and food banks, like the Sandy Community Action Center, Sandy, Oregon, work on the front lines of today's economic recovery. And they need support.
The collapse of the chicken market nationally is creating economic turmoil in much of the rural South, where farmers have invested heavily in chicken houses. David Zucchino of the Los Angeles Times reports from Silar City, North Carolina, "The worst recession in decades has hammered all types of businesses across the country, farming included. But among the hardest hit are contract chicken farmers in the South and especially in North Carolina, the nation's second-leading poultry producer, where it is a $3.3-billion industry."
Thousands of farmers invested millions of dollars in chicken houses and equipment. They signed contracts with large processors — Tyson's, Pilgrim's Pride — and earned a small percentage on their investment for raising chicks. When demand for chicken dropped, the chicken processors began cutting back. Pilgrim's filed for bankruptcy. In six central North Carolina counties, Zucchino reports, 44 farmers (who owe at least $18 million to banks on their chicken house investments) lost their contracts with Pilgrim's. Nationally, 900 chicken farmers have lost contracts since last fall.
Zucchino visits with chicken farmer Andrew Meeks, who lost his contract with Pilgrim's and has put his farm up for sale. (There are no lookers.) "All I ever aspired to be was a farmer. Chicken farming is a good life," he said, sitting in his frame house at dusk, gazing out at this three forlorn chicken houses. "Now I don't know what I'll do. I have no idea."
We at the Yonder realize that everything in America these days is moral. But corn? We watched a video of Michelle Obama talking with school kids about the coming White House garden. She asks the kids about gardening and one student brings up the "three sisters" — the combination of corn, beans and squash that sustained families for generations. "Are we having the three sisters?" asks the First Lady. Nope. The Whites House garden will only have two, beans and squash. "We're not going to have corn," said the First Gardener. See the video here.
Corn is baaaaaad. Corn makes us guzzle tanks of soda and wolf down box after box of Big Macs -- or so we're told. Corn is an "evil" crop these days, grown only to make expensive biofuels and to concoct corn syrup to make our schoolchildren fat. The New York Times reported this week that corn has gotten such a bad name that companies are advertising that their products have "natural" sugar. Pepsi Natural is the drink without corn syrup. And "natural" foods is a national movement, led by chef Alice Waters (above, with no corn).
Why corn is UN-natural is never exactly explained. The last we looked, corn grew out of the ground just like cane. The New York Times explains this week there is really little difference and that if a tyke guzzles a gallon of Pepsi Natural each day he'll get just as tubby as a kid who downs a gallon of pop sweetened with corn syrup. Dr. Robert H. Lustig, a pediatric endocrinologist at the University of California, San Francisco Children’s Hospital, said: “The argument about which is better for you, sucrose or HFCS, is garbage. Both are equally bad for your health.” Only one, however, makes you feel righteous.