The Federal Communications Commission voted unanimously to allow wireless spectrum abandoned in the switch to digital television to be used for wireless Internet connections. The use of these so-called "white spaces" in the spectrum is expected to quicken broadband connections in rural communities and make broadband less expensive.
Broadcasters and theater producers opposed this move, contending that Internet signals could bleed into wireless microphone frequencies and television signals. Technology companies like Google and Microsoft favored the FCC's action.
Rural communities expect the FCC's decision will create more competition among companies that provide broadband. Broadband will become "massively available," according to some tech writers, and the connections will be "ultra-fast."
Dolly is on one side. Google the other. The decision comes today.
The Federal Communications Commission is supposed to decide today whether to allow unused television broadcast spectrum to be turned over to wireless Internet gadgets. Google, Microsoft and a lot of rural communities favor using these "white spaces" for Internet Wi-Fi. Dolly Parton is against the proposal, fearing that Wi-Fi will interfere with wireless microphones used in concerts, sports venues, Las Vegas casinos and Broadway theaters. They argue filling the unused spectrum with Internet signals will cause static and interfere with broadcasts.
The New York Times has a good rundown on the issue today. The argument from rural communities is that the unused spectrum (left open when television broadcasts go all digital in 2009) will easily and cheaply bring Internet broadband to every county. A Google official said it would create "Wi-Fi on steroids...It could become a ubiquitous nationwide broadband network."
The lead sentence in an article from a newspaper in the nation's most rural state says it all: "A decision expected early next week by the Federal Communications Commission could result in a major boost for Vermont's efforts to bring high-speed Internet service to the entire state by the year 2010." Daniel Barlow writes that the FCC will vote Election Day on whether to open television "white spaces" — frequencies that will be freed up once TV broadcasts go fully digital — for use for wireless broadband. "That change could be a boon for rural states such as Vermont, where these white spaces are abundant due to the lack of in-state television broadcasters," Barlow wrote.
The use of white spaces for broadband is suited for rural states, Barlow wrote, because the signals pass through walls and trees, making broadband signals available in more isolated parts of the very rural state. A study released by the FCC found that these white spaces could be used for broadband without harming television signals.
Observers say there is an even chance that the FCC will delay its vote on the white spaces issue. Television broadcasters oppose the use of white spaces for broadband. Microsoft and Google favor opening white spaces to broadband providers.
The chairman of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) this week said he supported the use of empty portions of the television broadcasting spectrum — known as "white spaces" — for unlicensed wireless use. The spectrum could be used to cheaply connect underserved communities to Internet. A FCC report issued this week supported the use of wireless devices that could access these white spaces.
Broadcasters opposed the FCC's findings, saying the use of whites spaces by unlicensed wireless devices will harm TV reception. The whites spaces are parts of the current television broadcast spectrum that will become available after broadcasts go digital in 2009.
Microsoft, Google, Dell and rural Internet advocates have urged the FCC to open these whites spaces to wireless devices. They say the white spaces could be used to provide rural community Internet access, improve emergency response communications and offer advanced broadband capabilities to mobile device users.
Both presidential candidates have pledged to improve Internet access and technology training in rural America. Obama advocates legislation to make it happen; McCain trusts the free market to bring it about.
Access to high-speed Internet service in rural areas lags behind the cities and suburbs But by how much? And to what effect? Inquiring minds won't really know until the FCC gathers better information on providers and users.
The abuse of opiates is a harrowing problem in parts of rural America. So is addiction treatment. In a letter to the professional journal Psychiatric Services, a doctor in Golden, Colorado, describes how he has been working with rural patients through telepsychiatry. "Over the past two years, I have treated approximately 40 opioid-dependent patients from communities throughout Colorado, all of whom were seen exclusively via telepsychiatry from their own homes or offices," writes Dr. Douglas M. Ikelheimer.
Ikelheimer is among the "relatively small number "of physicians certified to prescribe buprenorphine, a drug recently approved to manage dependence on opiates. Using fairly inexpensive video-conferencing software (like iChat and Skype), he is able to diagnose patients and monitor their conditions, working in conjunction with local doctors, laboratories, and pharmacists. Patients with home computers, Webcams, and the high-speed Internet access they require, can take advantage of this treatment.
"As this process becomes more widely accepted by physicians, patients, and the insurance industry," he writes, "it may well represent the long-sought realization of the potential for telepsychiatry as an efficacious and cost-saving modality with far-reaching implications."
Solid internet technology and the expertise to use it have to be priorities of rural leaders now. It's time to get stubborn about supply and entrepreneurial about demand.
"It's not rocket science, and it doesn't cost a tremendous amount of money" -- How often do you hear those two statements in one breath, when the subject's rural health care? But that's how Ann Rathke of North Dakota University, Fargo, described the state's telepharmacy program.
With rural pharmacies closing all over the state, the legislature amended strict laws on pharmacies in 2001 and opened the way for, now, 67 telepharmacy centers. Dave Kolpack reported on the program for AP, focusing on Arthur, N.D. "Pharmacy technicians" validate prescriptions with full-fledged pharamacists via remote cameras. "Once the prescription is approved, patients have a mandatory private consultation with pharmacists through real-time video and audio."
Texas, Vermont, Wyoming, and other states are considering adopting such a system, an alternative for rural patients who otherwise would have to travel long distances for medicine or order drugs through the mail. According to Rathke, purchasing and installing the necessary equipment for each telepharmacy in North Dakota has cost about $18,000.
The success of rural e-commerce requires fast connections to the Internet, but according to educator Frank Odasz, flexible leadership is just as critical as technology.