"Grains Gone Wild" is the headline in Paul Krugman's New York Times column today. There are financial troubles in the world, Krugman writes, "But there's another world crisis under way — and it's hurting a lot more people. I'm talking about the food crisis."
Krugman, a Princeton economist, notes the higher prices in stores today and food riots around the world. One cause is that more people can afford to eat meat — in other words, more people are eating like Americans. Other reasons are high oil prices and bad weather around the globe. These are all problems that are happening naturally.
Krugman, however, believes using corn to produce government-subsidized ethanol is a "terrible mistake." Or, as the always outspoken Krugman puts it, "people are starving in Africa so that American politicians can court votes in farm states." The result, "Cheap food, like cheap oil, may be a thing of the past."
The Washington Post weighs in this morning with a long front-page story about the world's "burning appetite" for coal. The price of coal has risen faster than the price of oil. Ship are lined up in Australian ports waiting for deliveries. "Freight cars in Appalachia are brimming with coal for export, and old coal mines in Japan have been reopened or expanded," according to reporters Steven Mufson and Blaine Harden.
The result will be major investments in coal producing and transporting facilities. Consol is trying to decide whether to expand its Appalachian operations and add capacity at the harbor in Baltimore.
The story tells how coal mining is expanding around the world. And even though coal use is finding opponents in the US, that's not true elsewhere. Coal is king these days not in West Virginia, but in India.
There are people — utility presidents and those running for office — who like to talk about "clean coal" technology. In last Sunday's Washington Post, Jeff Biggers wrote that there's no such thing.
"Clean coal: Never was there an oxymoron more insidious, or more dangerous to our public health," Biggers wrote. "Invoked as often by the Democratic presidential candidates as by the Republicans and by liberals and conservatives alike, this slogan has blindsided any meaningful progress toward a sustainable energy policy...Coal ain't clean. Coal is deadly."
Biggers, author of The United States of Appalachia, reminds us that despite the more than 100,000 people who have died in American coal mines since 1900, it's still a struggle to enforce mine safety laws. (The Bush Administration wants to cut funds for inspections.) And although an area the size of Delaware has been stripped bare in the last two decades, there's still talk about coal as a benign fuel.
FutureGen was supposed to produce electricity from coal without polluting or emitting carbon dioxide, a greenhouse gas. In December, the US Department of Energy announced FutureGen would arise in central Illinois and then, a month later, the US DOE said FutureGen wouldn't be built at all. The $1.8 billion project was cancelled. (Residents in Tuscola, Illinois, gathered, above, to hear if their town was picked for FutureGen.)
What happened? The DOE said the dang thing had gotten too expensive. (It started at $1 billion and had nearly doubled in cost over the years.) Illinois legislators are asking for an investigation, convinced a Texan at DOE killed the project because it was to be built in Illinois instead of within a day's drive of the Alamo.
The Washington Post editorial page said, good riddance: "As noble as FutureGen was, putting so much hope in just one project was not the way to go about it." The Boston Globe editorial page came to the opposite conclusion: "Congress should call on the Government Accountability Office to investigate how the department made its decision to pull out of a project it had once hailed as key to producing clean power with coal."
The newspaper in Bristol, Virginia, is fighting the construction of a coal-fired power plant in nearby Wise County. (Picture above shows plant site.) The opposition of the Bristol Herald to Dominion Power's plant is one of what will likely be dozens of battles between and power companies planning to build new plants in rural areas.
The Herald notes that Dominion will use the latest anti-pollution technology, which is fine. But the plant will still pollute and, according to the paper's editorial, "Dominion has failed to prove that the new plant will not further degrade the region's air quality."
Mostly, however, the Herald notes that the "region will live with the consequences but reap few rewards. The plant will provide a bit of an economic boost, but many of the jobs created will be temporary construction work. And Dominion almost certainly received state and local incentives to build the plant in Wise County. Such governmental gift-giving further reduces any economic benefits."