Edmond, Oklahoma, attorney Harlan Hentges tells us that the Oklahoma Department of Agriculture, Food and Forestry has announced that it would "force youth exhibitors at livestock shows to sign up for a 'voluntary' National Animal Identification System." That is what the Oklahoma Agriculture Blog (Oklahoma's Official Agriculture Information Site) says: "Participants in swine shows and exhibits will be required to have an official premise identification card issued by the Oklahoma Department of Agriculture, Food, and Forestry effective August 1. Officials say the rule will protect both economic and social interests."
Attorney Hentges objects. "Using children to force farmers to do something that is supposed to be 'voluntary' is something far worse than NAIS. This use of children to manipulate parents is entirely illegitimate — perhaps it is best described as Orwellian."
The Oklahoma ag department argued that it placed the requirement on the young exhibitors as a way to track the possible spread of H1N1 virus (yes, the "swine" flu). Hentges wrote this was a "patently false claim" — false "because the NAIS system is not operational and will not be for years, if ever. (The state) is only getting information." He adds. "These are not the actions of independent public servants. This is Big Brother."
Ag and Trade | Cool Places | Main Street Economics
The Aberdeen American News has the most incredible story today. It's about Herman Schumacher, a livestock sale barn owner and longtime advocate for independent cattle producers, who is about ready to lose his property. Schumacher and others had the temerity some time ago to file suit against several large meatpacking companies (Tyson, Cargill and Swift) claiming the companies violated federal law by manipulating prices paid to cattle raisers. Schumacher won. In the spring of 2006, a South Dakota jury ruled in his favor, finding that the packers "knowingly used erroneous U.S. Department of Agriculture price reports to pay less to producers for beef cattle." The jurors awarded the plaintiffs $9.25 million.
An appeals court overturned that verdict and now Schumacher has a notice on his front door from the U.S. Marshal saying he owes about $16,000 to Tyson. (Picture above.) A federal judge ruled Schumacher owed that to defray the company's court costs. Now if Schumacher doesn't pay the bill, he'll lose his house in Herreid, South Dakota. He wins his case before a jury, but has that verdict taken away by judges.
“In a sense (the writ of execution) is on my door, but it's on the door of any producer that dares speak out” against meat packers, Schumacher said. “I really do think they're trying to make an example of me, to silence me."
European farmers, angry about both low food prices and by impending animal tagging rules, crowded the roads around central Luxembourg on Monday as European Union officials gathered to discuss agricultural policies. Farmers blocked streets with tractors, carried signs (above) like "Farmers in Torment," and set afire a stack of hay outside the European Court of Justice. Like American dairyman, European milk producers are in particular trouble. Farmers heaved bottles of milk against the shields of police. European dairy producers are upset that severe drops in farmgate prices are not showing up on grocery shelves.
Reports varied, but as many as 5,000 farmers and 1,000 tractors were engaged in the protest. They came from 27 countries. Sheep raisers were particularly evident in the protest. These farmers are protesting proposed rules that would require electronic tags on each animal — a proposal similar to the National Animal Identification System (NAIS) in this country. Irish farmers penned some sheep at the head of this protest.
The animal tagging controversy has generated considerable ire among British stockmen. They estimate that calls to place an electronic tag on each animal will cost about $5 per head. The National Farmers Union Scotland has said the system would both reduce the size of herds and would fail in the Scottish terrain.
John Boyd (above) is the kind of person that makes rural America like nowhere else in the world. The Washington Post has a front page profile of Boyd, a Virginia farmer who has been working eight and a half years to find some justice for nearly 70,000 black farmers. The U.S. Department of Agriculture discriminated for years against black farmers, denying them the programs and loans available to white farmers. Boyd was one of them. He lost his wife, family and nearly his farm when government officials literally tore up his loan application as he watched. Boyd joined a lawsuit against the federal government and, in 1999, he was among those black farmers who received a settlement from the USDA. But Boyd soon learned that 70,000 farmers didn't know about the suit or the settlement.
Nearly 9 years ago, Boyd began lobbying Congress to offer compensation to those farmers, too. The Post follows John Boyd from his soybean farm in southern Virginia to the halls of Congress as he spends his time and money trying to find help for his fellow farmers. It is a story of uncommon will. (Be sure to watch the slide show.)
President Obama has included $1.25 billion in his budget for these farmers. Boyd figures that is only half of what's needed to make these 70,000 whole. So Boyd leaves his farm — his broken tractor and hay that need baling — to drive to Washington, D.C. to talk to people who probably prefer that he just go away. What the Post story makes clear is that John Boyd isn't going anywhere.
Congresswoman Rosa DeLauro, a Connecticut Democrat (above), has removed all moved all the funds in the U.S. Department of Agriculture's 2010 budget to implement NAIS, the National Animal Identification System. NAIS would require that every farm animal be tagged. The proposal has stirred mass opposition in farm and ranch country. (See the Yonder's latest story here. For more, just search above for NAIS.) DeLauro was able to excise the NAIS funding because she is chair of the House Agriculture Appropriations Subcommittee.
DeLauro noted that the USDA has received $142 million since 2004 to start NAIS, but has "yet to put into operation an effective system that would provide needed animal health and livestock market benefits." DeLauro noted that USDA was currently conducting "listening sessions" about NAIS and that until these sessions ended and the USDA tells how it would implement an animal ID system, "continued investments into the current NAIS are unwarranted."
This doesn't mean NAIS is dead. Cattle Network says the "ball game just went into extra innings." Right now, the politics of NAIS are cool. Rep. DeLauro "votes with the left-leaning caucus of her party," notes Cattle Network. And "NAIS is a concept abhorred by small family farmers, about as conservative a group of people as you can find on the American political scene." So the new hero for many rural Americans is a Connecticut Yankee. How about them apples?
Some development pros are recommending that small towns go back to
recruiting outside companies. Tim Collins argues that a strong base of
local entrepreneurs has to be the first order of business.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture is holding 'listening sessions' on its plan to tag farm animals. Yonder writer Richard Oswald drives to Jefferson City, Missouri, to testify.
Europe is headed toward a continent-wide election — and to promote the event, voters are being told the new Parliament will decide how food is labeled.