Saturday, May 25, 2013

Speak Your Piece: Waiting for the HSUS

08/22/2012

Humane Society President Wayne Parcelle talks to farmers and ranchers Bill Bishop/Daily Yonder Humane Society president Wayne Pacelle spoke to the Organization for Competitive Markets in Kansas City. What he didn't say was how the HSUS could help independent farmers and ranchers or rural communities.

Almost a year ago, the Humane Society of the U.S. and the Nebraska Farmers Union (NeFU) formed an advisory council

It was the first such alliance in the country between an ag organization and the HSUS. But it wasn’t the last.

In July, the Organization for Competitive Markets (OCM) said it has formed an alliance with the Humane Society. HSUS president Wayne Pacelle spoke at the OCM meeting in Kansas City, August 10.

I understand what the HSUS and independent farmers and ranchers have in common: The NeFU and OCM need allies in their fight against the large (some would say monopolistic) groups that control ag markets and the lives of farmers and ranchers. HSUS is opposed to factory farming methods that are the foundation of corporate agribusiness. 

The enemy of my enemy is my friend. I get it. 

I also understand the benefits of this kind of alliance. HSUS gains an ally in the farm and ranch country where the organization is trying to change factory farming practices — from tail docking at dairies to the size of gestation crates on hog farms.

The farmers and ranchers at OCM and NeFU, meanwhile, believe HSUS could help open new markets for the food they produce by steering urban foodies to their products. (Maybe the HSUS could brand products from independent producers.) HSUS could also provide some lobbying clout in Congress when it comes to writing (or enforcing) laws about competition and monopolies.

In theory, everybody wins. Markets are opened, allowing independent producers to thrive. Animals are saved from factory farms. Food quality improves. Rural communities benefit from having local owners and operators who are making more money. 

It could work. But for a coalition to prosper, don’t you need to have both sides publicly supporting each other?

I sat through Pacelle’s speech to OCM in Kansas City and I waited to hear him talk about markets and what the HSUS could do for family farmers. Pacelle talked…and talked. But he never got to the part about how the HSUS was going to help support family agriculture.

Instead, Pacelle preached to a room full of people who grew animals for a living — who have lived with animals from the day they were born — about the “bond between us and animals” and how we have become “alienated from animals.” 

Pacelle talked about the history of the animal welfare movement and how “things have skidded off the tracks in terms of the industrial model” of agriculture. Industrial agriculture is wrong, Pacelle said, because it is impossible to “care for tens of thousands of animals on some of these industrial farms…There is no connection between the keepers of these animals and the animals themselves.”

On Pacelle went, about morality and responsibility, about the history of the horse and what it means to be a “proper custodian” of animals.

Near the end of his talk (sermon), Pacelle said the HSUS was interested in “providing markets for farmers who are doing it a better way. We’ve been trying to drive the market by connecting consumers to these decisions.” I was anxious to hear some specifics about how this might work and what, exactly, the HSUS had done. There weren’t any.

Pacelle’s visit to Kansas City and the meeting of the Organization for Competitive Markets came during a tour he was taking of farms in the Midwest. When he got back to Washington, D.C., he wrote about his travels on the HSUS website. Did he write about markets for independent farmers and ranchers, about how this coalition would work to benefit independent producers?

Nope. In 1,200 words, Pacelle mentioned “markets” once, and that was when he said he “addressed the family farmers at the Organization for Competitive Markets….”  Instead, Pacelle wrote about his visits to farms where animals are treated as “curious, intelligent, feeling creatures.” 

Pacelle wrote that the HSUS “welcomes vegans, vegetarians, and meat-eaters alike.” And what does Pacelle want out of that coalition of eaters? He ends his story this way:

The common thread we demand is conscious awareness of animals and their basic needs, and an effort to find better ways to live and do business with the intent of creating a new, humane economy. When it comes to agricultural producers, we as a movement must engage them. They have billions of animals under their care, and the welfare of these creatures should be top-of-mind for them, since animals are the very essence of their enterprises. When they ignore their responsibilities to animals, that’s when they run into trouble, from The HSUS and from the rest of the American public.

Missing from Pacelle’s “common thread,” and demands was any mention of what the HSUS intended to do for farmers and ranchers. 

How does HSUS intend to make good on its promise to “engage” urban consumers about monopoly markets that are strangling rural America? It’s hard to see. After all, did HSUS show any muscle when it came time to pressure Congress and the Obama administration to pass laws or initiate lawsuits aimed at restoring free markets in the food business?

Not that I heard of.

Humane Society President Wayne Parcelle talks to farmers and ranchers Bill Bishop/Daily Yonder The HSUS wants a coalition with independent ag groups. So far, the groups have gotten a lot of grief from their members — and some sweet rolls.

Pacelle said that he had supported strong rules proposed by Dudley Butler at the Grain Inspection Packers and Stockyards Administration, but when I searched his blog for “GIPSA” or “Dudley Butler,” nothing came up. On the general HSUS website, all that I found was a single, tepid, three-paragraph “statement” the HSUS put out last October.

It said that HSUS supported “country of origin labeling,” the COOL regulations that would require food processors to tell consumers where the product was raised. I’m sure that’s true, but there is no mention of “country of origin labeling” on Pacelle’s blog or the HSUS website. 

I searched for “antitrust” and there was nothing there about the Obama administration’s investigation into market monopolies in seeds, pork, chicken, beef or groceries.

If HSUS has been active in this area, fighting to open markets for independent farmers and ranchers, the organization has been way behind the scenes. The union representing meatpackers turned out members to support ranchers at a hearing on beef monopolies held two summers ago in Fort Collins, Colorado. Where was the HSUS?

OCM president Fred Stokes said HSUS did call a meeting to share information on how checkoff money is being used by commodity groups for “lobbying,” a violation of federal regulations. Stokes said that meeting led to a suit filed by Kansas City attorney Dan Owen to block checkoff funds from going to the National Cattlemen’s Beef Association. 

Stokes said “every cowboy out there owes a deep debt of gratitude to the Humane Society of the U.S.” (Owen said HSUS provided no support in the preparation of his case.)

Stokes is generous — and, along with the Nebraska Farmers Union, he’s taken a lot of heat for allying with the HSUS. (See the NCBA’s statement here.) 

Similarly, Kansas rancher Mike Callicrate has been on radio shows around cow country defending the alliance with the HSUS. He told Drovers: “They don’t like the way animals are treated under the Smithfield-Tyson-JBS-Cargill model of food production. So they said ‘hey, we like the family farm and ranch model, we want to support that, what can we do to help?’   We aren’t going to turn them away because someone said one time they are anti animal agriculture. They’ve been called an animal rights group. They are not that, they are an animal welfare group, and I’m in complete alignment with their philosophy that animals should be treated humanely – as well as people.”

These guys have held up their side of the deal.

And what has HSUS done, publicly, to bring over their largely urban constituency to support independent farmers and ranchers? Well, HSUS did pay for a few sweet rolls and some coffee at the OCM convention, a donation celebrated in a sign set next to the silverware. But what else?

And when?

Bill Bishop is co-editor of The Daily Yonder.

Comments

H$U$'s leadership is anti-animal-use, so who's lying?

Lying Wayne

 

HSUS has always been clear in every workshop and every symposium or conference that the goal of HSUS is to end american animal agriculture. To think that they have changed is just plain stupid. Every organization that worked with them when they though they were for animal welfare have been stung by that scorpion HSUS. AKC is the most recent victim.

They tell their volunteers that they are morally correct to lie to save the sentient animals from evil humans. 

Muarice Strong who started AGENDA21 stated to the UN that until American animal agriculture was taken down they could not have one world government under the goals of AGENDA 21. Strong then stated that HSUS was the perfect organization to do that as they could sway public opinion to buy into the empathy for animals because of their close association with pets. 

 

f you wonder to yourself why the Humane Society of the United States (HSUS) spends millions of dollars fighting farms, eradicating eggs, howling about hogs, and heckling some of the nation’s top food chains over their menus —then wonder no more.

HSUS wants everyone in America and on Earth to be vegans.

The proof is in Wayne Pacelle’s, HSUS CEO, recent blog. Pacelle snorts that he’s upset because a recent meeting of the United Nation’s Food and Agriculture Organization would not permit him to present his meatless manifesto —or totally vegan agenda— before the group.

Pacelle claims meat is responsible for environmental problems on Earth, climate change, and nearly anything he can point to and blame. Pacelle squawks that his meatless manifesto should have been at the top of the international sustainable development conference section of the United Nation’s list.

Then Pacelle goes on to rail against meat, eggs, and milk. Next, he blasts farming as irresponsible and credits farming with water shortages, poverty and other woes. Odd, but the HSUS has been forcing their animal rights programs on farms for years. But in all this anti-meat mean mouthing, the table is set for the ultimate HSUS endeavor —fund raising. Yes, Pacelle asks readers and followers for funds to further this vegan agenda.

According to Pacelle: “From our perspective, climate change is an animal welfare issue as much as an environmental one, and it’s an increasingly important focus of work for both The HSUS and Humane Society International. Rising meat consumption is also a significant driver of factory farming, which threatens food security (especially for the poor), water security, public health, and the sustainability of rural communities.”

Finally the HSUS followers are encouraged to sign up for a HSUS weekly vegan newsletter. Oops, Pacelle forgot to mention that HSUS has bought shares of Hardees, McDonald’s Wendy’s and other type restaurants where diners enjoy MEAT-based dishes and sandwiches.

And you just thought HSUS was opposed to factory farms and hunting. Think again —and tell at least 10 other folks this 

 

 

KISS

stands for keep it simple sweetheart..

"My goal is the abolition of all animal agriculture." JP Goodwin, employed at the Humane Society of the US,

"We have no ethical obligation to preserve the different breeds of livestock produced through selective breeding. . One generation and out. We have no problem with the extinction of domestic animals. They are creations of human selective breeding." Wayne Pacelle, Senior VP of Humane Society of the US  stated in his earleir days befoe he says he became more "nuanced' in his beliefs.. .. he has not changed his beliefs.. only made them more "nuanced".. in other words.. easier to slip by people

"I dream of a vegan world - that's where I want everything to go." Gene Baur, Farm Sanctuary close ally of the HSUS

"The good news, and what is really going to help immensely, is the Humane Society of the United States (HSUS) just passed their vegan policy. They are seen as the mothering organization for the SPCAs,
shelters and animal control agencies. And the fact that they have adopted a vegan policy may just be the major breakthrough to bring others along. All HSUS expos, trainings, conferences will be vegan. It is huge." Kim Sturla, SATYA Nov/Dec 04 "The Barnyard Campus: Teaching Compassion for All"

"... nothing is more important than promoting veganism." Paul Shapiro, who heads HSUS' anti-Factory Farm Campaign, addressing the National Student Animal Rights Conference, University of California - Berkeley, Oct. 31, 2004

 

any more questions?  why doesn't someone ask Wayne about these statements  and many others when he is speaking to them?

Give credit where it's due

Hi Mr. Bishop, really enjoyed this article. However, I think you're not giving the HSUS enough credit.

Most of the organization's work involving livestock is focused on ending the use of intensive confinement - an anti-competitive practice that puts pastured and mixed farms at a major disadvantage. By reforming these problems with the big CAFOs, they make life that much easier for the little guys.

Also, their lawyers are hard at work keeping CAFO operations from stealing small farmers' hard-earned market share through misrepresentation (for example, the fraudulent "organic" representations alleged in the Aurora Dairy case) and monopolistic practices (like the antitrust suit against the UEP and major battery egg operations). 

On a more general level, bringing the inhumane treatment of animals on CAFOs to the public's attention stimulates a demand for more humane and sustainable sources, which I think partly explains the massive expansion of farmers markets and Community Supported Agriculture programs we're seeing in urban areas.

But I think you're wondering what the HSUS is doing to directly build marketshare for small farmers? It's probably too soon to tell. As you noted, besides helping to finance the OCM's lawsuit challenging the AMS's preferential treatment of big feedlot operators, it's also begun setting up a series of state agricultural councils run by and for small farmers. Exactly what their efforts will look like is presently unclear (at least to me), but keep in mind that a former HSUS VP (one that the tinfoil hat set in the comments above loves to quote as wanting to destroy agriculture) is currently ED of the Global Animal Partnership - one of the most succesful private programs for small livestock farmers in recent history, so odds are HSUS knows how to get results on this front.

In the meantime, I think the simple fact that the HSUS is making it clear to anyone who will listen that they support small farmers will do a great deal to improve the public's attitude about agriculture, and hopefully do something about the present situation where too many people think they have to either go totally vegan or resign themselves to supporting the status quo - a gospel that too many farmers have been preaching to their peril. 

I wonder if you find my comment persausive at all? Also, have you contacted anyone at the HSUS to get their side in all of this? 

Thanks, CodyJames

Thanks for the comments, CJ.

I did sit through Wayne Pacelle's speech and a Q&A session at the OCM meeting. Surely, if HSUS was going to talk about markets, independent producers and rural communities, it would be there. 

Later, in talking with Brownfield, Pacelle had this exchange: 

“We don’t want to see diversion of checkoff funds to lobby against good programs like the one called for in the HSUS-UEP agreement.” Reminded that there are firewalls in place to prevent checkoff funds from being used for lobbying by NCBA, Pacelle says, “if that’s the case, then we have no quarrels at HSUS—and I would think that NCBA doesn’t have much to be worried about. “Again, we’re not a plaintiff or a co-signer—we’re concerned about the misuse of checkoff funds, especially for lobbying purposes.”

So, as long as NCBA doesn't use money for lobbying, then everything is A-OK with HSUS.

I didn't call HSUS because I wasn't interested in what they'd tell a reporter. I was interested in what they are telling the public.

Finally, in reference to the lawsuit on checkoffs, Dan Owen, who brought the suit, said pointedly that HSUS had provided nothing for that effort.

HSUS talking about lobbying?

I find it laughable that HSUS would say anything about other organizations using money for lobbying. HSUS raises billions of dollars through ads that make animal lovers think the money is going to save shelter dogs and cats (when less than one percent is actually spent that way). But most of its money goes toward "campaigns" promoting laws to regulate animal industries. That is lobbying, and it is prohibited of 501(c)(3) organizations such as HSUS. Why is HSUS allowed to get away with that? 

I worked for a national commodity checkoff for several years. We bent over backward to avoid getting anywhere near using checkoff dollars for lobbying. I am not concerned about checkoff funds used for lobbying. I am concerned about the massive deception of HSUS on the public--its deceptive fundraising tactics and its use of funds for prohibited purposes. Why is that not the story?