Friday, November 20, 2009

Rural Internet Connections In U.S. Falls Short of Other Countries

07/09/2007
Broadband Urban, Suburban and Rural
Broadband connections have been increasing everywhere, but only a little over 30 percent of rural Americans have fast-speed Internet in their homes, according to the Pew Internet & American Life Project.

 

Rural Americans are less likely to use the Internet than people living in urban or suburban regions — and that is largely because they have less internet connections. Only 60 percent of rural residents use the Internet from any location, compared to the national average of 71 percent.

broadband subgroupsThere is a large gap between rural and urban residents in the speed of their internet connection, according to a survey conducted by the Pew Internet and American Life Project. Living in a rural community is a bigger impediment to broadband connection than either race or income, according to Pew — and although rural Americans are quickly signing up for broadband connections, they are still two years behind the adoption rates in suburbia or the city. Only 38 percent of rural residents have a broadband Internet connection at either home or work, according to Pew. In the cities and suburbs, 55 percent have high-speed connections.

Geography, more than race, determines who has access to broadband Internet connections. According to Pew, African-Americans and whites with similar levels of education and income have similar levels of broadband use. But rural Americans of all races, incomes and education levels are significantly less likely to have speedy Internet connections.

Meanwhile, an attorney specializing in communications policy told the National Rural Assembly that rural residents in other countries had better access to faster broadband service. Mark Lloyd, a senior fellow at the Center for American Progress, said the "great promise (of broadband service) is being realized in New Brunswick, Canada, and Tono, Japan, and in the farm country of south west Ireland. Great strides have been made in these countries since 2000. Great strides have not been made in Mississippi and Utah and Oklahoma and Kansas."

In New Brunswick, Canada, Lloyd said, a combination of government support and private investment had built out broadband connections to 327 small communities. Now over 90 percent of New Brunswickers have broadband access — at speeds that exceed that of cable modems and DSL in the U.S.

Internet at home and work


Only 38 percent of rural Americans have broadband connection either at home or at work. In urban areas, 58 percent of the people have fast-speed connection at some point during the day, according to the Pew Internet and American Life Project.

 

 

 

 

 

Mark Lloyd

 

Mark Lloyd, far left, testified to an informal meeting in Congress during the National Rural Assembly.

Photo: M.A. Pember

 

 

 

 

 

Broadband versus dialup

 

 

Dial up is out; broadband is in for most of America, according to Pew.

Comments

Rural Internet Access

EEEEXCUUUUSE ME?! And this is a bad thing??! Why should we assume that having high-speed internet access in rural areas is so great? In fact, why should we be in the habit of thinking that any piece of slick high-technology that rural America doesn't have is automatically good for rural Americans, and that they are suffering and discriminated against if they don't have it. This is typical of the journalism that urban Americans write about pitiable rural Americans: Rural American culture is deficient and wretched because it lacks something (Starbucks; Volvo dealers; gay art museums; high-speed internet access) that urban Americans possess. Maybe what's great and splendid about rural America and rural Americans is that they've had A LOT LESS exposure to all of this urban crap. Discussion please:

Eco Dev

Having hi-speed access would do wonders for eco development in rural areas. If I could work from my rural home via the Internet, I would. It would also cut down on car-dependency - which causes pollution and loss of productivity (traffic congestion) and let's face it, a diminished quality of life. BTW, I find it ironic that you're using the Internet to make your point :)

Rural Development and the Internet

You want a city job? -- Go work in the city. The last thing rural people want is a bunch of city people doing city work and "telecommuting." Center for Rural Strategies sponsors this site -- pshaw -- this is a bunch of affluent urban liberals who think they know what's right for rural America. Just look at who funds this site! It's all the flaky liberal freaks running the big philanthropies. ONE QUESTION: Rural Strategies for What? I wonder. We don't want to be like urban America. We don't want the people, we don't want the sprawl, the traffic, the crime, the "lovely diversity," the alternative lifestyles, Starbucks on every corner, and we don't want the PEOPLE!! Got It? So Center for Rural Strategies, why don't you rename your operation: THE CENTER FOR RURAL STRATEGIES TO MAKE RURAL PLACES MORE URBAN Ugh! Who needs that? I will take our few rural problems over the monumental urban problems any day of the week. So, urban ignorami and liberal philanthropy freaks, go back to figuring out strategies to save your own neighborhoods! Then maybe you'll have just a thread of credibility in approaching our problems.

Internet Access in Rural Areas

No irony. I have internet access and I use it. I have also not become dependent upon it for anything. I _could_ manage as well without it. I consider that an advantage. I am questioning whether rural people sense the same deprivation and sense of missing-out, for not having broadband access, or any number of other things that city folk have, that articles like this seem to imply that they do. For some people in rural America, the idea is not to envy big cities, or big-city style development, or to want what the city folk have. I don't have their standard-of-living, for instance, and that doesn't bother me. I don't consider myself deprived or underprivileged for living in a county that is below average in national median income. I don't need someone to come and tell me that I'm pathetic and falling-behind the rest of the world. In fact, I'm rather insulted by that. Call me a luddite if you wish. But that kind of independence is part of what makes rural America great!

Surprised

I have to admit that I am surprised by many of the reactions to this article. I grew up in a rural community. I chose a career in software development that effectively requires that I have broadband access. I would love to live in the rural America of my childhood but I cannot, unless I were to consider changing careers. I wonder how typical my story is. I see my flight from rural America as part of the story of declining rural populations and dying main streets. I understand the concern that having certain values forced on rural America could change it in ways that you do not want. On the other hand, if rural communities do not maintain links to larger neighboring communities, how can you expect your children to stay, your populations to hold, and your small storefronts to remain open? How would folks on this thread have reacted decades ago, if we were debating extending telephone and electricity to rural areas? Would the reactions be the same?

A little touchy, are we?

Some of the above comments seem unreasonably defensive. I don't see how anybody's being hurt by better internet access. If you don't want to use it, don't. I live 3 miles from town and get 40 Kbps on a good day. I can't experiment with Linux, something I'd really like to do, because of that one roadblock. Qwest apparently has no plans to run DSL up the road. Some friends a mile away bought a new computer. Their previous PC was 8-9 years old and I'd mistakenly blamed the old machine for their horrid connection speed. The new PC gets 10.7 Kbps, measured at the MSU.edu website. Started doing some checking; turns out their neighbors are all about the same. No cable or DSL options exist. They'd like to receive e-mailed pictures of their grandkids, but when it takes hours to download (if they don't get kicked off) it's just not feasible. Let's face it, the ability to download pictures of the grandkids is not going to ruin the rural life style. Look at it this way. They're paying just as much for an internet connection as someone in town getting 45 Kbps. They're getting one quarter of the value for their money. That kind of looks like a rip-off.